Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« One man bows while another man plucks | Main | What will become of the arctic circle candy? »
March 31, 2005
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- On Lydia Tár's EGOT
- Gefahr im Ziel
- I doff my assless chaps one leg at a time just like the next intermillennial yobbo
- Two or three confusions about five or six pages of Bernard Williams
- Their words, for you
- My pettiest post ever
- Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- Wingtip Dot Club
- Ford contra O'Shaugnessy
- The fire in me now
Recent Comments
- josh k-sky on On Lydia Tár's EGOT
- Zack on This be close reading
- John Harvey on Notice
- Daniel Lindquist on Their words, for you
- Mr. F on My pettiest post ever
- Daniel on Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- ben w on This be close reading
- k-sky on Wingtip Dot Club
- Frances Kirby on Literary expose of the century!
- Daniel Lindquist on The fire in me now
You are correct. On the other hand, the sweater is much more attractive than the tie, which is ugly, so it (the sweater) is probably more worth the money.
Posted by: bitchphd | April 01, 2005 at 12:34 PM
whatever, that tie rules.
Posted by: tammy | April 04, 2005 at 08:04 AM
all the other sweaters are incredibly ugly, but if I had $400 lying around I would buy The Commie Sweater. Is $90 for a tie normal?
Posted by: mmcc | April 05, 2005 at 09:21 PM