(15:19:57) Adam Kotsko: I think that if you were creative enough, you could tailor your vocabulary accordingly.
(15:19:58) rumjuggler: you kmow what I mean
(15:20:04) rumjuggler: maybe
(15:20:21) rumjuggler: feet are sad
(15:20:30) rumjuggler: create a new draw!
(15:21:09) rumjuggler: drat! Few are the new rats. Fear the new taxes.
(15:21:16) Adam Kotsko: Awesome.
(15:21:25) Adam Kotsko: This is a blog post begging to be written.
(15:21:48) rumjuggler: bread is the very faddish grater
But what's there as a means, that creates a sentence-starter, as S V? Verbs are there, as are names, etc, but where are, eg, "he", "she" as the sayer?---We, as sayers. Negaters, they are absent, but "but". What a hardship! Contiguity is the only way to extend reach to the other side; one wants to start in the same side, though.
The DNA is not obvious
Posted by: dave zacuto | October 16, 2005 at 03:47 PM
"kmow"?
I am appalled. Shocked and appalled.
Posted by: bitchphd | October 16, 2005 at 05:58 PM
I'm typing with one hand, non-dominant—gimme a break, here.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 16, 2005 at 06:03 PM
each negater but "but" absent? never!
Posted by: Matt Weiner | October 16, 2005 at 09:04 PM
Drat! What a retard was he that rated "never" as never a negater! As what treats he the term, then?—Maybe he had never a "never"-dawn; that dawn necessary an any treatment whatever be: the term never ready at hand, he never treats the term even as negater-ready.
Feh!
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 16, 2005 at 09:27 PM
I charge you with a holy quest: a lipogram.
Posted by: rone | October 16, 2005 at 10:39 PM
You mean another one, right?
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 16, 2005 at 10:44 PM
Kampan’yō-isu no ryōkin wa tokubetsu ni ikura desu ka?
Posted by: Michael | October 17, 2005 at 12:37 AM
Michael, that was even more awesome than I realized at first.
Posted by: Matt Weiner | October 18, 2005 at 08:56 AM
Can someone explain?
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 18, 2005 at 09:34 AM
It's from L'Heure Bleue in Amphigorey Also; Googling (without the thingummies on the 'o's) will get you the whole English text, not that that will help.
And since this does not have any connection to Li Po (being in Japanese, duh), this means that you came up with the "Li Po Gram" yourself. That is also awesome. Awesomeness all round!
Posted by: Matt Weiner | October 18, 2005 at 09:37 AM
The thingummies are macrons?
Posted by: Matt Weiner | October 18, 2005 at 09:38 AM
Yeah, macrons.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 18, 2005 at 09:53 AM
That's one of those words I shouldn't make you type right now, isn't it? Like 'paleography'.
Posted by: Matt Weiner | October 18, 2005 at 09:56 AM
Yeah, fuck you.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 18, 2005 at 10:10 AM
Hey Ben, check this out.
Posted by: Matt Weiner | October 24, 2005 at 09:53 AM
"g odoreida", Weiner?
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 24, 2005 at 10:04 AM
Sure (I've decided that, since it seems unlikely that I will want to start a Blog Of Indiscretion, there's no reason for me to keep my blogger ID completely secure.)
Posted by: Matt Weiner | October 24, 2005 at 10:31 AM
It took me a month to get the post title. A new record!
Matt might be interested to know it was this song (lyrics) what jogged my thinker.
Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | November 25, 2005 at 01:25 PM
Does the post title mean anything as it stands?
Posted by: Matt Weiner | November 25, 2005 at 03:36 PM
Not to my knowledge.
Posted by: ben wolfson | November 25, 2005 at 03:58 PM