85%, I think, is too much cocoa content for me to really enjoy.
But maybe it's not me, but you.
« Uexküll | Main | Why last night was not a wizard cocksucker night »
October 12, 2005
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Posts
- Their words, for you
- My pettiest post ever
- Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- Wingtip Dot Club
- Ford contra O'Shaugnessy
- The fire in me now
- The credulity of the recappers, or, what does Rick & Morty have in common with "Who Was Nietzsche's Genealogist?"
- Bad faith, briefly expounded
- Verse roundup!!!!
- Sculptural realism, or, Michelangelo on knowing one's mind
Recent Comments
- Daniel Lindquist on Their words, for you
- Mr. F on My pettiest post ever
- Daniel on Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- ben w on This be close reading
- k-sky on Wingtip Dot Club
- Frances Kirby on Literary expose of the century!
- Daniel Lindquist on The fire in me now
- gurpreet kaur on A solution finder for Language, Proof and Logic problems
- haste makes waste on On a popular misconception concerning "literally"
- Idioms.in on This common idiom has an odd feature! Core dumped.
I can scarcely believe those reviews aren't a joke, of a piece with the site itself, especially after reading sentences like "This is one of those “why bother?” chocolates;"
Posted by: dave zacuto | October 12, 2005 at 10:06 PM
.
Posted by: dave zacuto | October 12, 2005 at 10:07 PM
savor in the dark ecstasy!
Chocolates have some awesome names, I'll tell you what.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 12, 2005 at 10:10 PM
70% is definitely all the cocoa i need.
Posted by: rone | October 13, 2005 at 10:04 AM
This is my favorite of the chocolate bars I've had.
Posted by: Michael | October 13, 2005 at 09:15 PM
I'm partial to this one, for obvious reasons.
Posted by: apostropher | October 14, 2005 at 06:36 AM