85%, I think, is too much cocoa content for me to really enjoy.
But maybe it's not me, but you.
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Uexküll | Main | Why last night was not a wizard cocksucker night »
October 12, 2005
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- On Lydia Tár's EGOT
- Gefahr im Ziel
- I doff my assless chaps one leg at a time just like the next intermillennial yobbo
- Two or three confusions about five or six pages of Bernard Williams
- Their words, for you
- My pettiest post ever
- Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- Wingtip Dot Club
- Ford contra O'Shaugnessy
- The fire in me now
Recent Comments
- josh k-sky on On Lydia Tár's EGOT
- Zack on This be close reading
- John Harvey on Notice
- Daniel Lindquist on Their words, for you
- Mr. F on My pettiest post ever
- Daniel on Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- ben w on This be close reading
- k-sky on Wingtip Dot Club
- Frances Kirby on Literary expose of the century!
- Daniel Lindquist on The fire in me now
I can scarcely believe those reviews aren't a joke, of a piece with the site itself, especially after reading sentences like "This is one of those “why bother?” chocolates;"
Posted by: dave zacuto | October 12, 2005 at 10:06 PM
.
Posted by: dave zacuto | October 12, 2005 at 10:07 PM
savor in the dark ecstasy!
Chocolates have some awesome names, I'll tell you what.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 12, 2005 at 10:10 PM
70% is definitely all the cocoa i need.
Posted by: rone | October 13, 2005 at 10:04 AM
This is my favorite of the chocolate bars I've had.
Posted by: Michael | October 13, 2005 at 09:15 PM
I'm partial to this one, for obvious reasons.
Posted by: apostropher | October 14, 2005 at 06:36 AM