Glucose (pronouced "glose") isn't actually any different from ordinary sucrose. It's just what they call it in England, where for a long time the only one allowed to refine sugar (not personally, you understand, but in an extended sense) was the Duke of Gloucester.
He was famous for polishing his coat of arms to a gloucessy finish.
Posted by: rone | October 14, 2006 at 02:11 PM
You can take jokes like that and get loucest, rone.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 14, 2006 at 02:13 PM
Yes, those jokes go from bad to Worcester.
Posted by: rone | October 14, 2006 at 02:58 PM
So, you hear about the farmer who strung a bell necklacewise from one of his cows? Yeah, he did it leicester approach go unnoticed.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 14, 2006 at 03:00 PM
But the Duke of Sucroster was allowed to force meat into a tube of intestine, making sucrosages.
Posted by: Nakku | October 14, 2006 at 03:06 PM
making sucrosages
ITYM "getting him convicted on grounds of gross indecency".
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 14, 2006 at 03:07 PM
Ummmmm actually glucose is a 6-membered sugar ring while sucrose is made up of a glucose ring joined to a fructose (which is a five membered ring if anyone is counting).
Posted by: DrJ | October 15, 2006 at 01:55 AM
What’s sucrose for the goocrose is sucrose for the galnonder.
Posted by: standpipe b | October 15, 2006 at 12:51 PM
Best. Poucest. Ever.
Posted by: m. leblanc | October 15, 2006 at 02:46 PM
beicest.
Posted by: mcmc | October 15, 2006 at 05:00 PM
It's time we laid this conceit to reicest.
Posted by: standpipe b | October 15, 2006 at 08:18 PM
Though a year late, my sincerest British applesauce.
Posted by: KM | October 03, 2007 at 10:22 PM
Oh very well done indeed.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 03, 2007 at 10:30 PM