I present to you the zombie modernism concept of a friend of mine:
Well, as I'm sure you know, the advent of post-modernism as such is coeval with the advent of zombies.
But as we all know post-modernism is a retread of modernism is a retread of Romanticism.
So why not rewrite classic works of modernism (or even Romanticism) in which key figures are zombies?
(I thought the argument would be that post-modernism is zombie modernism is zombie romanticism, but evidently not.) He gives examples: "For instance: "Stately, bold [sic] Buck Mulligan... BRAINS!" That could be Ulysses. Benn's "Gehirne" could probably stay the same.". I think it's a great idea! One could start with Manfred, because, after all, does not Manfred desire to eat BRAINS—namely, his own brains, and the memories they contain?
Everyone knows that Byron was a vampire, not a zombie.
Posted by: bitchphd | November 24, 2006 at 07:34 PM
We're talking about Manfred here.
Posted by: ben wolfson | November 24, 2006 at 07:39 PM
What, you've got a problem with the whole identification of author with work thing?
Posted by: bitchphd | November 24, 2006 at 08:00 PM
I thought the argument would be that post-modernism is zombie modernism is zombie romanticism
That's what the argument should be.
Posted by: Jackmormon | November 25, 2006 at 06:03 PM
So I guess that when analytic philosophers talk about how you can tell your friends aren't zombies, that's their way of entering into the postmodernism debate.
Posted by: Adam Kotsko | November 26, 2006 at 10:03 AM