"There is jam, but not for us." (Attributed to the White Queen.)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Liberalizing Erdős-Bacon Numbers | Main | Fourteen ways of spelling "Ourang-Outan" »
February 07, 2007
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- Their words, for you
- My pettiest post ever
- Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- Wingtip Dot Club
- Ford contra O'Shaugnessy
- The fire in me now
- The credulity of the recappers, or, what does Rick & Morty have in common with "Who Was Nietzsche's Genealogist?"
- Bad faith, briefly expounded
- Verse roundup!!!!
- Sculptural realism, or, Michelangelo on knowing one's mind
Recent Comments
- Daniel Lindquist on Their words, for you
- Mr. F on My pettiest post ever
- Daniel on Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- ben w on This be close reading
- k-sky on Wingtip Dot Club
- Frances Kirby on Literary expose of the century!
- Daniel Lindquist on The fire in me now
- gurpreet kaur on A solution finder for Language, Proof and Logic problems
- haste makes waste on On a popular misconception concerning "literally"
- Idioms.in on This common idiom has an odd feature! Core dumped.
I don't think he was actually a pederast.
Posted by: dave zacuto | February 09, 2007 at 01:16 PM
Where "jam" is a truncation of enjambement, which means literally to straddle; clearly, putting this opinion in the mouth of a mature female character could be construed, but why would you do that.
Posted by: dave zacuto | February 09, 2007 at 01:18 PM