Is it possible to undervalue Duck Amuck?
Even this much more straightforward cartoon is pretty great.
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« The mysteries of etymologyrevealed! | Main | A tactfully suggested emendation »
September 21, 2008
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- Gefahr im Ziel
- I doff my assless chaps one leg at a time just like the next intermillennial yobbo
- Two or three confusions about five or six pages of Bernard Williams
- Their words, for you
- My pettiest post ever
- Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- Wingtip Dot Club
- Ford contra O'Shaugnessy
- The fire in me now
- The credulity of the recappers, or, what does Rick & Morty have in common with "Who Was Nietzsche's Genealogist?"
Recent Comments
- josh k-sky on On Lydia Tár's EGOT
- Zack on This be close reading
- John Harvey on Notice
- Daniel Lindquist on Their words, for you
- Mr. F on My pettiest post ever
- Daniel on Are we Aristotle's enemies?
- ben w on This be close reading
- k-sky on Wingtip Dot Club
- Frances Kirby on Literary expose of the century!
- Daniel Lindquist on The fire in me now
You have given me much joy.
Posted by: A White Bear | September 21, 2008 at 07:08 PM
These were my sister's favs.
Posted by: bitchphd | September 21, 2008 at 09:38 PM
Thanks for the link to sour persimmons. That was hilarious. Is the way Daffy said the word "perSIMmons" common in the US? Here in NZ it's normally persiMINs.
Posted by: Stuart | September 23, 2008 at 08:44 PM
I've never heard it the NZ way.
Posted by: ben wolfson | September 23, 2008 at 08:48 PM
awesome
Posted by: abc | September 24, 2008 at 07:45 AM